Can Dyslexia Be Cured?

The prevailing view says “no” — but read the fine print.

Reputable organizations describe dyslexia as lifelong and emphasize that it cannot be cured in the medical sense. Still, they point out that with early, evidence-based support, learners can thrive. The Yale Center for Dyslexia & Creativity states it plainly: “Dyslexia can’t be ‘cured’ — it is lifelong,” yet early, evidence-based intervention and accommodations enable success.¹ The UK’s NHS echoes this: dyslexia is “a lifelong problem,” but specialist educational interventions improve reading and writing.² Harvard Health adds: “Dyslexia cannot be cured,” though with diagnosis and appropriate treatment, many people succeed academically and professionally.³

Our clarification:

“Cured” here rejects medical or miracle fixes, not the possibility of restoring reading to the age-appropriate range with intensive, targeted instruction. For this article, we’ll use the term “functional cure” to mean achieving age-appropriate reading and spelling norms and maintaining those gains through continued practice and instruction.

Is dyslexia a brain disorder?

A widely cited paper by Protopapas and Parrila argues that dyslexia is best understood as the lower end of a continuous distribution of reading skill rather than a discrete neuropathology. They note that in the vast majority of cases, there is no evidence of obvious neurological abnormality, and that group neuroimaging differences are largely correlational.⁴

Why that matters, and why it doesn’t:

Labeling dyslexia a disorder can suggest immutability; labeling it a variation can make it sound trivial. Neither settles the practical question families care about: Can targeted intervention normalize reading? Ultimately, labels don’t determine outcomes — interventions and progress do.

For balance:

Many authorities still classify dyslexia (DSM: Specific Learning Disorder with impairment in reading) as a neurodevelopmental disorder because it produces meaningful impairment in school and daily life, even though reading ability itself lies on a continuum.⁵ ⁶

So, what if it is brain-based?

Even if dyslexia is treated as a brain-based condition, the key concept is that of neuroplasticity. Neuroplasticity refers to the brain’s ability to change its structure and function in response to experience, practice, or injury — by strengthening or weakening connections between neurons, forming new ones, and reorganizing networks. Reading instruction can measurably reshape the reading network.

Brain changes with reading intervention:

• After 100 hours of intensive remedial instruction, poor readers demonstrated shifted cortical activation during sentence comprehension, which was aligned with improved performance, and these changes persisted a year later.⁷
• Tutoring adults with dyslexia led to reading gains alongside increased activation in left-hemisphere reading regions and compensatory right-hemisphere activity.⁸
• Intensive instruction produced microstructural changes in left anterior white matter (centrum semiovale) and related tracts — an anatomical correlate of improvement.⁹
• Longitudinal diffusion-MRI tracked experience-dependent growth in reading skills and white-matter properties during a short, intensive intervention.¹⁰
• A six-week summer program reported reading gains accompanied by changes in white-matter microstructure.¹¹

When adults learn to read, even the brainstem changes:

A longitudinal study teaching illiterate Indian adults to read over six months found that literacy training not only affected the cortex but also increased functional connectivity between the visual cortex and subcortical regions in the thalamus and midbrain (brainstem). Gains in these deep-structure connections tracked with improvements in letter knowledge and word reading.¹² The Max Planck Institute summed it up bluntly: learning to read in one’s thirties reconfigures evolutionarily older circuits, including the thalamus and brainstem.¹³

Takeaway:

“Brain-based” ≠ “fixed.” The reading network is trainable in both children and adults.

Enter evidence-based reading instruction

The National Reading Panel and the What Works Clearinghouse agree that explicit, systematic teaching of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension benefits both K–3 learners and struggling readers. The International Dyslexia Association’s Structured Literacy framework captures not only the content but also the method: instruction that is explicit, systematic, cumulative, and diagnostic.¹⁴–¹⁶

Necessary — but not always sufficient

Strong instruction is essential, but research shows it does not guarantee success for all. Meta-analyses and multi-year syntheses report moderate average effects, with a sizeable minority of students still falling below benchmark unless intervention is earlier, longer, and more intensive.¹⁷–²⁰

Why some students don’t respond

In many of these so-called inadequate responder cases, the barrier is not a lack of effort or motivation, but rather underlying cognitive bottlenecks. These include not only weaknesses in phonemic awareness but also in attention, visuospatial abilities, processing speed, short-term memory, verbal working memory, visual sequential memory, visual long-term memory, and rapid naming. Such weaknesses make it harder to hold sounds in mind, manage the code, and automatize reading.

Bridging the gap

Addressing these cognitive skills alongside Structured Literacy helps more learning “stick,” reduces the instructional dose needed for the same gain, and makes improvements more durable over time.¹⁹ ²⁰

Why add brain (cognitive) training?

If Structured Literacy is the engine, targeted cognitive training can be the turbo — especially when it directly supports reading processes and is paired with reading practice. Cognitive training boosts the very skills that make literacy instruction “stick.”

Training attention

Just as phonemic awareness can be trained, so can attention. Randomized trials of an FDA-authorized digital therapeutic (AKL-T01) report measurable improvements in objective attention.²¹ Similar protocols using action-video-game tasks (with no reading content) have shown gains in attentional control and, in some studies, faster reading in children with dyslexia.²² ²³ A small, controlled Edublox clinic evaluation also found significant short-term improvements in focused attention after five days of intensive cognitive training.²⁴

Training visuospatial skills

Visuospatial ability — the ability to perceive, analyze, and mentally manipulate spatial relationships — is another trainable domain. A meta-analysis of 217 training studies found moderate, durable, and generalizable improvements in spatial skills (Hedges g≈0.47). An early-childhood meta-analysis (ages 0–8) reported even larger effects (g≈0.96) for classroom or play-based programs. An RCT with 6- to 8-year-olds demonstrated that even a single session of mental-rotation training improved calculation performance.²⁵–²⁷

Training processing speed

Processing speed — the rate at which one perceives, processes, and responds to information — is also responsive to intervention. An eight-week RCT with 7–9-year-olds yielded large gains on WISC-IV Coding after speed-of-processing training (d≈1.15). A four-week Reading Acceleration program increased contextual reading speed while reorganizing activation in reading networks.²⁸ ²⁹ An evaluation of Edublox’s Online Tutor likewise found significant pre- to post-test gains in processing speed (overall within-subject F(1,61)=104.824, p<.001), with the Edublox group improving from 2.18 to 4.38 and outperforming both educational-game and control groups.³⁰

Training memory and rapid naming

Other critical bottlenecks are trainable as well:

• Verbal working memory — holding and manipulating sound-based information for a few seconds.
• Visual sequential memory — encoding and recalling the order of briefly presented visual items.
• Visual long-term memory — storing and retrieving visual forms and patterns over extended intervals.
• Rapid automatized naming (RAN) — speeded retrieval of phonological labels for familiar visual stimuli.

Studies confirm that these components can be strengthened with targeted practice, supporting more efficient reading.³¹–³⁴

So… can dyslexia be cured?

Not in the medical sense — there’s no pill that erases dyslexia — but a functional cure is a realistic goal for many learners: achieving age-appropriate reading and spelling and maintaining those gains with continued practice. That outcome is most likely when two pieces work together: explicit, intensive Structured Literacy and targeted cognitive training to strengthen attention, processing speed, visuospatial skills, working memory, visual memory, and rapid naming so that instruction “sticks.” Neuroplasticity research in both children and adults shows that well-designed instruction reshapes the brain’s reading network — functionally and even in white matter — underscoring that “brain-based” does not mean fixed.

What success looks like:

• Normalization: standard scores within the typical range for age/grade on reading and spelling
• Generalization: the gains show up in classwork, homework, and timed tasks
• Durability: progress is maintained over time with ongoing reading and reasonable support

Realistic expectations:

Progress is not instant, and outcomes vary. An earlier start, higher intensity, longer duration, and a plan tailored to the learner’s profile all improve the odds. In our model, cognitive training is not optional: every learner’s reading depends on attention, speed, memory, visuospatial mapping, and naming — so we strengthen these skills for all students, adjusting intensity to individual need.

Bottom line:

We are not promising miracles. Our goal is normalization, generalization, and durability — achieved through disciplined, evidence-based teaching and cognitive training. The science indicates this is both reasonable and achievable.

---

Edublox offers cognitive training and live online tutoring to students with dyslexia. We support families in the United States, Canada, Australia, and elsewhere. Book a free consultation to discuss your child’s learning needs.

16 Dyslexia Success Stories from Real Families

---

References for Can Dyslexia be Cured?

1. Yale Center for Dyslexia & Creativity. Dyslexia FAQ. Retrieved September 27, 2025, from https://dyslexia.yale.edu/dyslexia/dyslexia-faq/
2. National Health Service (NHS). Dyslexia — Management. Retrieved September 27, 2025, from https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/dyslexia/living-with/
3. Harvard Health Publishing. Dyslexia. Retrieved September 27, 2025, from https://www.health.harvard.edu/mind-and-mood/dyslexia-a-to-z
4. Protopapas A, Parrila R. Is dyslexia a brain disorder? Brain Sciences. 2018;8(4):61.
5. American Psychiatric Association. What Are Specific Learning Disorders? (DSM-5 overview page). Retrieved September 27, 2025, from https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/specific-learning-disorder/what-is-specific-learning-disorder
6. Peterson RL, Pennington BF. Developmental dyslexia. The Lancet. 2012;379(9830):1997–2007.
7. Meyler A, Keller TA, Cherkassky VL, Lee D, Hoeft F, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Gabrieli JDE, Just MA. Modifying the brain activation of poor readers during sentence comprehension with extended remedial instruction: A longitudinal study of neuroplasticity. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(10):2580–2592.
8. Eden GF, Jones KM, Cappell K, Gareau L, Wood FB, Zeffiro TA, Dietz NA, Agnew JA, Flowers DL. Neural changes following remediation in adult developmental dyslexia. Neuron. 2004;44(3):411–422.
9. Keller TA, Just MA. Altering cortical connectivity: Remediation-induced changes in the white matter of poor readers. Neuron. 2009;64(5):624–631.
10. Huber E, Donnelly PM, Rokem A, Yeatman JD. Rapid and widespread white matter plasticity during an intensive reading intervention. Nature Communications. 2018;9:2260.
11. Meisler SL, Huberty S, Karma S, Casto A, Einziger M, Arbel N, Feldman O, Yeatman JD. White matter microstructural plasticity associated with educational intervention in reading disability. NPJ Science of Learning. 2024;9:18.
12. Skeide MA, Kumar U, Mishra RK, Tripathi VN, Guleria A, Singh JP, Eisner F, Huettig F. Learning to read alters cortico-subcortical cross-talk in the visual system of illiterates. Science Advances. 2017;3(5):e1602612.
13. Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences. Amazingly flexible: Learning to read in your thirties profoundly transforms the brain. Press release; May 22, 2017. Retrieved September 27, 2025, from https://www.cbs.mpg.de/Amazingly-flexible-Learning-to-read-profoundly-transforms-the-brain
14. National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000.
15. What Works Clearinghouse. Foundational Skills to Support Reading for Understanding in K–3; 2016.
16. International Dyslexia Association. Structured Literacy: Effective Instruction for Students with Dyslexia and Related Reading Difficulties. Retrieved September 27, 2025, from https://app.box.com/s/noj70cwd28vnvevb85xy1mm2yr29h7g9
17. Wanzek J, Stevens EA, Williams KJ, Scammacca N, Vaughn S, Sargent K. Current evidence on the effects of intensive early reading interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2018;51(6):612–624.
18. Wanzek J, Vaughn S. Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students with low response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2008;41(2):126–142.
19. Denton CA, Fletcher JM, Anthony JL, Francis DJ. An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2006;39(5):447–466.
20. Hall C, Dahl-Leonard K, Cho E, Solari EJ, Capin P, Conner CL, Henry AR, Cook L, Hayes L, Vargas I, Richmond CL, Kehoe KF. Forty years of reading intervention research for elementary students with or at risk for dyslexia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly. 2023;58(2):285–312.
21. Kollins SH, DeLoss DJ, Cañadas E, Lutz J, Findling RL, Keefe RSE, et al. A novel digital intervention for actively reducing severity of paediatric ADHD (STARS-ADHD): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Digital Health. 2020;2(4):e168–e178.
22. Franceschini S, Gori S, Ruffino M, Viola S, Molteni M, Facoetti A. Action video games make dyslexic children read better. Current Biology. 2013;23(6):462–466.
23. Peters JL, Crewther SG, Murphy MJ, Bavin EL. Action video game training improves text reading accuracy, rate and comprehension in children with dyslexia: a randomized controlled trial. Scientific Reports. 2021;11:18584.
24. Edublox. Edublox Improves Concentration Significantly in 5 Days. (Clinic evaluation; analyzed by the University of Pretoria’s Center for Evaluation and Assessment.) Retrieved September 27, 2025, from https://www.edubloxtutor.com/edublox-research-study-better-concentration-five-days/
25. Uttal DH, Meadow NG, Tipton E, Hand LL, Alden AR, Warren C, Newcombe NS. The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin. 2013;139(2):352–402.
26. Yang W, Liu H, Chen N, Xu P, Lin X. Is early spatial skills training effective? A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:1938.
27. Cheng Y-L, Mix KS. Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development. 2014;15(1):2–11.
28. Mackey AP, Hill SS, Stone SI, Bunge SA. Differential effects of reasoning and speed training in children. Developmental Science. 2011;14(3):582–590.
29. Horowitz-Kraus T, Vannest JJ, Kadis D, Cicchino N, Wang YY, Holland SK. Reading acceleration training changes brain circuitry in children with reading difficulties. Brain and Behavior. 2014;4(6):886–902.
30. Dawood NE. The impact of the Edublox Online Tutor (EOT) programme on the cognitive functioning of primary school children [Master’s dissertation]. University of Pretoria; 2020.
31. Dunning DL, Holmes J, Gathercole SE. Does working memory training lead to generalized improvements in children with low working memory? A randomized controlled trial. Developmental Science. 2013;16(3):350–361.
32. Chan JS, Wu Q, Liang D, Yan JH. Visuospatial working memory training facilitates visually-aided explicit sequence learning. Acta Psychologica. 2015;161:145–153.
33. Dresler M, Shirer WR, Konrad BN, et al. Mnemonic training reshapes brain networks to support superior memory. Neuron. 2017;93(5):1227–1235.e6.
34. Graziani D, Capodieci A, Casalini C, Giaccherini S, Scali V, Luccherino L, Pecini C. Training rapid automatized naming in children with developmental dyslexia. Child Neuropsychology. 2025;31(4):519–545.

---

Can Dyslexia be Cured? was authored by Sue du Plessis (B.A. Hons Psychology; B.D.), a dyslexia specialist with 30+ years of experience in learning disabilities.

Edublox is proud to be a member of the International Dyslexia Association (IDA), a leading organization dedicated to evidence-based research and advocacy for individuals with dyslexia and related learning difficulties.